Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Grass
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pacific Grass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-Notable sculpture Mtking (edits) 06:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A mention at the artists article is sufficient. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, in New Zealand this is very much a notable sculpture. It is featured prominently in media about sculpture in New Zealand.CalvinSays 01:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CalvinSays (talk • contribs)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Subject appears to fail WP:GNG Topher385 (talk) 17:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.